Staking

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Staking

Post by tisnom1 on 26/10/2012, 10:32 pm

Box-stake along these guidelines to win big.
I recommend you have atleast 100m before you start staking.
This is how people truly achieve wonderful banks.


Upon winning a stake, reset values to 1 and cycle back through.
(1)500k
(2)750k
(3)1m
(4)1.5m
(5)2.5m
(6)4m
(7)6m
(8)8m
(9)13m
(10)19m
(11)29m
(12)43m

Here are the odds of you losing bank, assuming it's a 50/50 chance every time:
(it's not as simple as one in twelve odds to lose bank)


(1)success
failure 50%
(2)success
failure 25%
(3)success
failure 12.5%
(4)success
failure 6.25%
(5)success
failure 3.125%
(6)success
failure 1.5625%
(7)success
failure 0.78125%
(8)success
failure 0.390625%
(9)success
failure 0.1953125%
(10)success
failure 0.09765625%
(11)success
failure 0.058828125%
(12)success
failure 0.0244140625%

Additional notes:

* Just fyi, the odds of you losing bank are less than achieving max cash pile. *

* Tick-boxing is a method of switching in between defensive before being hit, and accurate/kick when hitting. Although this can be beneficial, I don't recommend you do this; as switching momentarily drops defense value to 0 and you will be impaled if hit during this small time frame. *
avatar
tisnom1
Tier 1 (Registered)
Tier 1 (Registered)


Back to top Go down

Re: Staking

Post by Dag on 27/10/2012, 4:39 am

This method is actually EXTREMELY risky.

Each box is a 50/50 chance of winning. Each previous box, or stake, has no effect on the next stake's outcome. Each is it's own independent entity, with it's own stakes - as stated before - 50/50.

This method is called the Martingale Betting Strategy (More information on this method can be found here.)

As I said before, this is a very risky method of staking, and is not recommended as a "Guaranteed Profit".

_____________________

avatar
Dag
Grandmaster (2000 posts)
Grandmaster (2000 posts)


Back to top Go down

Re: Staking

Post by Noobster on 28/10/2012, 12:16 pm

Wow lol, statistics to the max.
Maybe you can elaborate more with more letters rather than numbers lol.

by the way, this is all probability but if you look at it in a straightforward point of view you have a 50/50 chance of winning or losing FLAT.

I think what you are trying to say is the nightingale strategy but then again that is still full philosophy.

Noobster
Tier 1 (Registered)
Tier 1 (Registered)


Back to top Go down

Re: Staking

Post by M A F L A on 28/10/2012, 3:30 pm

I think hes talking about the chance of losing 12 stakes in a row is really unlikely. Although i have been on a 10 cold streak before myself. I believe other things such as "PID" and all sorts of bs come into play with staking.

M A F L A
Tier 1 (Registered)
Tier 1 (Registered)


Back to top Go down

Re: Staking

Post by redneck91 on 28/10/2012, 4:22 pm

The problem here is that people will always discuss 2 types of probabilities. Type 1 is the current probability and type 2 is overall probability. While there will be a small chance of losing 12 in a row, there is always the 50/50 chance of losing the current one. No matter how many you have done before.
avatar
redneck91
Tier 2 (100 posts)
Tier 2 (100 posts)


Back to top Go down

Re: Staking

Post by armadylian on 17/11/2012, 3:54 am

I used to do this, and usually you will profit..the best way to do that is walk after a set winning amount like 20m profit.... just dont get greedy.
avatar
armadylian
Tier 2 (100 posts)
Tier 2 (100 posts)


Back to top Go down

Re: Staking

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum